LORDS OF OPPOSITION AND
COMPLETION: THE GIANTS AS THE NEGATIVE ASPECT OF THE DIVINE
It
has often been remarked by students of Norse mythology that the distinction
between gods and giants is often vague, even in some cases nonexistent. This observation has led to a great deal of
confusion when it comes to trying to define the role and significance of giants
in Viking belief.
To
begin, we know that the first of the gods – including Odin himself - descend
from giants. Loki, the nemesis of the gods, is believed to be the son of a
giantess. Frey takes as his bride the
giant maiden Gerd. I’ve shown in other
chapters that sometimes a giant can pose as the seasonal counterpart of a god,
one being the ruler of the winter half-year and the other of the summer half-year. There are plenty of other examples of the
fluidity one encounters when attempting to compare and contrast gods and
giants.
Obviously,
the popular view that giants are, by their very nature, merely the enemies of
Order and all that is good for Nature and Man is an untenable one.
What,
then, exactly ARE giants, and why are they as a race set apart from the Aesir
and Vanir?
The
best example I can think of to illustrate the function and true identity of a
giant is the story of the duel between Thor and Hrungnir in Snorri Sturluson’s
Prose Edda (Skaldskaparmal 4). I’ve
treated of this myth in my essay on the valknut. There it was shown that Hrungnir was a hypostasis
of Thor, an “evil twin”, if you will, whose battle with the god was emblematic
of the thunderstorm. So in this sense
when we are told Thor is off fighting giants, in a very peculiar way he is off
fighting himself.
Another
case in point would be Thor’s fishing trip with the giant Hymir (Gylfaginning
48). In this myth, Thor has caught the
Midgard Serpent (= the Sea) and is ready to slay the monster with his lightning
hammer when his companion Hymir the Giant cuts the line. The Serpent promptly sinks back into the
sea. Enraged at being cheated of his
victory, Thor knocks the giant overboard.
The
story is fairly transparent, in that the thundergod has raised the sea in
agitation during a storm. The sea is
calmed only when the storm ceases, and this is brought about by Hymir’s cutting
of the line. In this way the giant is at
fault for allowing the Serpent to continue living. This will have dire consequences, as it is
prophesied that the Serpent will come up onto the land at Ragnarok and be the
death of the thundergod. Thor is, pun
strictly intended, “let off the hook”.
While
pagans regularly accepted the fact that the very same god who dispensed
blessings on Man could turn around and, for whatever reason, suddenly become
horribly destructive or at the very least unhelpful, there was still early on
the tendency to split off the negative aspect and to personify that as another
entity entirely. In this way the blame
for an undesirable act on the part of the god could be shifted to his
adversarial double. The god not only remained
guiltless, he could be presented in a highly favorable light as a protective or
savior deity.
In
short, the giants are the “fall guys” of Norse myth.
Was
this division of the god into good and bad halves a conscious creation on the
part of the priest-poets? Well, I can
only assume they understood their own myths, and if so, they certainly knew
that giants could be gods and gods could be giants.
No comments:
Post a Comment